When most professional artists start their careers, they are often lucky not to starve. This general rule, like most rules, does not apply if you are the son of the President of the United States.
Hunter Biden, the president’s son Joe biden, recently started painting and has agreed sell part of his art in a gallery, some of which can reach $ 500,000.
THE ART GALLERY MOVES FORWARD WITH HUNTER BIDEN’S EXHIBITION DESPITE THE N-WORD TEXT MESSAGE SCANDAL
“How much of that value is due to the art itself? It’s easy: none of it,” wrote Jeffry Cudlin, professor of art conservation studies and practice at Maryland Institute College. of Art, in an e-mail to Washington Examiner. “It’s a good job as a decorator. Hey everyone needs a hobby!”
While Biden’s works may raise an eyebrow or two, none of his paintings were particularly memorable, Cudlin said. They can cost anywhere from $ 850 to $ 3,000 for a buyer “to hang on someone’s couch”.
“If Hunter Biden were to apply to school for a BFA in painting, I think a portfolio with these pieces would indicate some sense of medium, some nascent talent, and encourage anyone to review him with a little training and a little study, Biden could one day make some interesting paintings, ”he said.
Cudlin distinguishes “avant-garde gallery culture”, which is filled with people advancing the medium and creating critically acclaimed works of art, from “traditional gallery culture”, which is filled with wealthy people. who like to surround themselves with cool things.
Judging by their comments on the art in a interview with Artnet, Biden and his curator fall into the latter category, Cudlin said.
“I don’t paint from emotions or feelings,” Biden said in the interview. “What I think are both very fleeting. For me, painting is much more of an attempt to bring out what is, I think, the universal truth.”
“The last time artists said things like that,” Cudlin said, “might have been around 1955. It’s a modernist trope, and modernism at this point is a period style, effectively having ended at the end of the following decade, around 1968. “
The comments from Biden dealer Georges Berges are not much better, Cudlin said.
The Berges gallery is located in SoHo, new York, which once housed many avant-garde galleries. From around 1980, it started to become a traditional gallery paradise, which is its current state.
Biden’s art “has that authenticity that I see in a lot of artists that I personally love, be it [Lucien] Freud or [Francis] Bacon, ”Berges said in the interview with Artnet.
“No artist has anything to do with the work of Hunter Biden,” Cudlin said.
“I can tell you that Freud and Bacon are the favorite painters of all the straight white types in the fraternity who took just one undergraduate art appreciation class for fun. This guy makes fun of most of the arts. post-Whistler or Degas, sometimes expressing the opinion “of art!” about something created in, say, 1928. “
Berges hopes to expand from its normal New York base to Beijing and Shanghai, the New York Post reported, and he said that China was “changing the world in terms of art and culture” in 2014.
He was charged with defrauding a $ 500,000 investor in a 2016 lawsuit. In 1998, he served 90 days in jail and 36 months probation for assault with a deadly weapon and terrorist threats.
Cudlin considered Biden and his gallery owner’s comments to be part of “a traditional gallery pitch.”
“I’m not saying this to be a snob,” Cudlin said, “or to make statements about his ability to move a brush. But he’s just not in the game – and there’s only one only game in town, and you’re either playing, or you’re not. “
Cudlin likened Biden’s art to a sweater worn by Kurt Cobain or some other collector’s item created or owned by a famous person.
“Things are worth what people are going to pay for things,” he said. “The value that a critic, art historian or curator might see in a work as successfully embodying powerful content, or showing an artist’s secure relationship with the history and possibilities of a medium , may have absolutely nothing to do with someone’s investment potential. sees an object as a collector’s item or novelty outside of its significance in contemporary art. “
Other celebrities who are not artists by trade have successfully created and sold paintings.
Sylvester Stallone also posted paintings in the galleries of Berges and fantasies himself “a much better painter than an actor.” The Beatles’ Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones’ Ronnie wood create paintings that are “objectively terrible,” according to Cudlin.
“I don’t blame Hunter or Sir Paul or Ronnie Wood [for] have an audience for their work, or any weird little shows or publications in which they have appeared. Good for them, I guess! And good for Mr. Biden, ”Cudlin said.
CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Original location: Is Hunter Biden’s Art Worth $ 500,000? Here’s what a curator has to say